logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline asdf  
#21 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:17:59(UTC)
asdf
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,340
Man
Location: Narsik

Thanks: 295 times
Was thanked: 539 time(s) in 290 post(s)
stephaniewazhere wrote:
asdf wrote:
stephaniewazhere wrote:
asdf wrote:
I got to take old greggs side here, AJ is one of the few people keeping RP alive and going strong rather than just being there.


But that has nothing to do with what he just did, I think AJ is good as well, but what the hell happened to him in this situation. If you all can''t see what he just did you are all vegetables.


What I see is that he wrote a legitamite review, you got mad, he told you why he wrote the review the way he did, you got madder, he got frustrated and told you to leave his thread alone, you got uber mad, he got angry, you blew up, and here we are.

This is my final word on the subject.



Wait hold the f*ck up, Who got mad?????


Both of you, in different ways and for different reasons.
Proud member since September 6th, 2007!

Proud to be a mod since May 5th, 2011!

Currently writing the longest Solo-Written RP in Rockstar Game History
User is suspended until 16/05/4760 03:38:29(UTC) stephaniewazhere  
#22 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:25:26(UTC)
stephaniewazhere
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 18,252
United States

Thanks: 6248 times
Was thanked: 7557 time(s) in 3439 post(s)
troymazing wrote:
stephaniewazhere wrote:
asdf wrote:
stephaniewazhere wrote:
asdf wrote:
I got to take old greggs side here, AJ is one of the few people keeping RP alive and going strong rather than just being there.


But that has nothing to do with what he just did, I think AJ is good as well, but what the hell happened to him in this situation. If you all can''t see what he just did you are all vegetables.


What I see is that he wrote a legitamite review, you got mad, he told you why he wrote the review the way he did, you got madder, he got frustrated and told you to leave his thread alone, you got uber mad, he got angry, you blew up, and here we are.

This is my final word on the subject.



Wait hold the f*ck up, Who got mad?????


You did, otherwise this entire thread wouldn't be full of your nonsense.


No I din't and stay out of this because you obviously don't know what is going on.


Do I need to outline the fucking shit.


What I wrole as Roleplay
To Smash Reviews,
It has been brought to my attention from many of my friends that read these reviews and fans of Stephanie Fierce that the reviewer from this mag that reviewed Stephanie Fierce's song should be fired. I myself then finally noticed this when I read a recent review of a song Stephanie Fierce was featured on. It feels as if the reviewer is a Stephanie Fierce hater rather than an actual music professional. His judgment is not suppose to be based on what he wanted on the song but on if the mission that Stephanie Fierce wanted for the song was a success. Its her song not his. If he ever reviews any of her stuff again I would like him to know some background information about her music before he does any more reviews about her songs or the songs that she is featured on. Her "older Stuff" is not really her. According to Stephanie Fierce, She had to rush her debut album and most of the songs weren't written by her. To be specific only two songs were written by her on her debut album. What she is giving in her second album is raw and truly 100% her. She made sure that all the songs contained personal experiences or situations she has delt with after she got famous. That's why the album is called "Diary Of A Pop sinner". 90% of the songs from her new album were written by her including "Love Feels Like Grenades". All I want is this guy who does the reviews to be straightened out otherwise I would never read a review from this magazine ever again.
From, Smash Reviews Reader


What he responded with
Don't read them then, it's not my problem she rushed her debut album. By saying what I 'wanted', it's a term obviously used as if from the perspective of someone buying the record, rather than the reviewers personal want affecting the single review. In fact, the review was quite nice. I rarely give anything over 75%, so if you can't take I suggest you go and write a review yourself and stop pestering me.
Liam
And he had an OOC with his response that he eventually removed where he was angered by my roleplay which he took personally. <--- I was only roleplaying and he took it personally


I responded
Upset Reader (Stephanie Fierce stan): I will definitely not read any of your reviews with the response I have been given. "I rarely give 75%" yeah fucking right! All the reviews except Stephanie Fierce have been given a rating more than 75%. Fuck you Smash Magazine! Stephanie Fierce is the queen of pop!!! OOC: lol what a classic!

Stephanie Fierce: I am most definitely not bothered by the review. It wasn't all that bad, I have gotten much worse. 70% is not bad at all actually. So, maybe Liam (or whatever his name is) hardly knows much about my music but it was his review and what he thought of the song. And even if it was a negative review it shouldn't matter especially if most of the reviews for the song were positive from Top Pop critics. And lastly I do not consider myself queen of Pop. But I am queen of Fierce music though! ;) Smash magazine is welcomed to review any of my music.

OOC: You need to learn how to roleplay. I was just trying to add a little fun to it, you need to learn how not to take things personally especially when the OOC: is nowhere on there. ITS ROLEPLAY!!!!



He then responded
75% is average for most artists. It just so happens that there are a lot of very good musicians out at the moment. I gave The Rockers 79%? If you actually read what it says on the site, 70% = good. So I thought the song was good. I think 'Upset Reader' needs to get out more.

Liam

ooc: Hardly, I was asking if you could stop clogging up my thread because that's meant for reviews only. You weren't trying to add a little fun, your an arrogant sod who had no problem when we were friends but now we've had an argument you have to act like a five year old and ruin my thread with stupid rants, which is why I made this.


I responded
OOC: You know what AJ fuck your little immature ass, I'm done with you. I seriously tried to be nice to you, and I'm sick of your little 12 year self.

You are a fucking ass hole and you DO NOT Know how to roleplay, I'm seriously done with you.


And so it goes on.



He got mad at me first, he took things personally and that's why it got out of hand, THAT'S WHY HE IS NOT GOOD AT ROLEPLAYING IN MY OPINION.


Offline asdf  
#23 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:28:16(UTC)
asdf
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,340
Man
Location: Narsik

Thanks: 295 times
Was thanked: 539 time(s) in 290 post(s)
First off, I dont thing how he responded was as bad as you are making it out to be, and for taking it as a non roleplay insult, maybe he was just going on past impression of you that he still has from when you were a horrid role player and yourself always took things as if they were personal insults?
Proud member since September 6th, 2007!

Proud to be a mod since May 5th, 2011!

Currently writing the longest Solo-Written RP in Rockstar Game History
Offline Paradox  
#24 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:29:43(UTC)
Paradox
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 08/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,007
Man
Location: cuernavaca, mexico

stephaniewazhere wrote:
troymazing wrote:
stephaniewazhere wrote:
asdf wrote:
stephaniewazhere wrote:
asdf wrote:
I got to take old greggs side here, AJ is one of the few people keeping RP alive and going strong rather than just being there.


But that has nothing to do with what he just did, I think AJ is good as well, but what the hell happened to him in this situation. If you all can''t see what he just did you are all vegetables.


What I see is that he wrote a legitamite review, you got mad, he told you why he wrote the review the way he did, you got madder, he got frustrated and told you to leave his thread alone, you got uber mad, he got angry, you blew up, and here we are.

This is my final word on the subject.



Wait hold the f*ck up, Who got mad?????


You did, otherwise this entire thread wouldn't be full of your nonsense.


No I din't and stay out of this because you obviously don't know what is going on.


Do I need to outline the fucking shit.


What I wrole as Roleplay
To Smash Reviews,
It has been brought to my attention from many of my friends that read these reviews and fans of Stephanie Fierce that the reviewer from this mag that reviewed Stephanie Fierce's song should be fired. I myself then finally noticed this when I read a recent review of a song Stephanie Fierce was featured on. It feels as if the reviewer is a Stephanie Fierce hater rather than an actual music professional. His judgment is not suppose to be based on what he wanted on the song but on if the mission that Stephanie Fierce wanted for the song was a success. Its her song not his. If he ever reviews any of her stuff again I would like him to know some background information about her music before he does any more reviews about her songs or the songs that she is featured on. Her "older Stuff" is not really her. According to Stephanie Fierce, She had to rush her debut album and most of the songs weren't written by her. To be specific only two songs were written by her on her debut album. What she is giving in her second album is raw and truly 100% her. She made sure that all the songs contained personal experiences or situations she has delt with after she got famous. That's why the album is called "Diary Of A Pop sinner". 90% of the songs from her new album were written by her including "Love Feels Like Grenades". All I want is this guy who does the reviews to be straightened out otherwise I would never read a review from this magazine ever again.
From, Smash Reviews Reader


What he responded with
Don't read them then, it's not my problem she rushed her debut album. By saying what I 'wanted', it's a term obviously used as if from the perspective of someone buying the record, rather than the reviewers personal want affecting the single review. In fact, the review was quite nice. I rarely give anything over 75%, so if you can't take I suggest you go and write a review yourself and stop pestering me.
Liam
And he had an OOC with his response that he eventually removed where he was angered by my roleplay which he took personally. <--- I was only roleplaying and he took it personally


I responded
Upset Reader (Stephanie Fierce stan): I will definitely not read any of your reviews with the response I have been given. "I rarely give 75%" yeah fucking right! All the reviews except Stephanie Fierce have been given a rating more than 75%. Fuck you Smash Magazine! Stephanie Fierce is the queen of pop!!! OOC: lol what a classic!

Stephanie Fierce: I am most definitely not bothered by the review. It wasn't all that bad, I have gotten much worse. 70% is not bad at all actually. So, maybe Liam (or whatever his name is) hardly knows much about my music but it was his review and what he thought of the song. And even if it was a negative review it shouldn't matter especially if most of the reviews for the song were positive from Top Pop critics. And lastly I do not consider myself queen of Pop. But I am queen of Fierce music though! ;) Smash magazine is welcomed to review any of my music.

OOC: You need to learn how to roleplay. I was just trying to add a little fun to it, you need to learn how not to take things personally especially when the OOC: is nowhere on there. ITS ROLEPLAY!!!!



He then responded
75% is average for most artists. It just so happens that there are a lot of very good musicians out at the moment. I gave The Rockers 79%? If you actually read what it says on the site, 70% = good. So I thought the song was good. I think 'Upset Reader' needs to get out more.

Liam

ooc: Hardly, I was asking if you could stop clogging up my thread because that's meant for reviews only. You weren't trying to add a little fun, your an arrogant sod who had no problem when we were friends but now we've had an argument you have to act like a five year old and ruin my thread with stupid rants, which is why I made this.


I responded
OOC: You know what AJ fuck your little immature ass, I'm done with you. I seriously tried to be nice to you, and I'm sick of your little 12 year self.

You are a fucking ass hole and you DO NOT Know how to roleplay, I'm seriously done with you.


And so it goes on.



He got mad at me first, he took things personally and that's why it got out of hand, THAT'S WHY HE IS NOT GOOD AT ROLEPLAYING IN MY OPINION.




Come on you both do great rps, one went terribly, terribly wrong, now could we stop this kindergarden fight, nobody cares who started it
RP bands:
Insolent Paradox - Progressive [Forum Thread] - Post-production
Oceans - Fusion Jazz - Writing

stephaniewazhere wrote:
I'm failing? I'm failing??????? LMAO!!!!!!



Mod Edit - you failed...


Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
Offline troymazing  
#25 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:29:59(UTC)
troymazing
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,414
Man
Location: Connecticut, USA

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
In my opinion you're just making yourself stupider. He wanted the review thread to be just for reviews, and you went and put a bunch of crap about how the reviews sucked (IC) and then he got mad. Which made you even more mad. And now you're just talking about how bad an RPer he is, but you do the SAME thing when people ruin your threads. It's like the pot calling the kettle black.
GirlSpice wrote:
Oh well.. she sits outside then. LOL!

Offline asdf  
#26 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:31:17(UTC)
asdf
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,340
Man
Location: Narsik

Thanks: 295 times
Was thanked: 539 time(s) in 290 post(s)
Quote:
Come on you both do great rps, one went terribly, terribly wrong, now could we stop this kindergarden fight, nobody cares who started it


Quote:
talking about how bad an RPer he is, but you do the SAME thing when people ruin your threads. It's like the pot calling the kettle black.


Truer words have never been spoken...
Proud member since September 6th, 2007!

Proud to be a mod since May 5th, 2011!

Currently writing the longest Solo-Written RP in Rockstar Game History
Offline old.gregg  
#27 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:31:49(UTC)
old.gregg
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,308
Man

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 6 post(s)
OOC: Permission to post a new thread, AJ, and I'll move the decent posts from this thread into it. Other than that, I've locked the thread because it's just going to end up another flamewar.
-
User is suspended until 16/05/4760 03:38:29(UTC) stephaniewazhere  
#28 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:33:49(UTC)
stephaniewazhere
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 18,252
United States

Thanks: 6248 times
Was thanked: 7557 time(s) in 3439 post(s)
asdf wrote:
First off, I dont thing how he responded was as bad as you are making it out to be, and for taking it as a non roleplay insult, maybe he was just going on past impression of you that he still has from when you were a horrid role player and yourself always took things as if they were personal insults?


That's why he is not a good roleplayer.

And first of all everyone starts off horrible when they begin. I mean you have been roleplaying for like two years and I feel I do more in roleplay than you. Back then people made fun of my spelling, grammar ect it had nothing to do with the content I actually put.
Offline old.gregg  
#29 Posted : 27 October 2009 10:36:12(UTC)
old.gregg
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,308
Man

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 6 post(s)
STOP POSTING THROUGH THE LOCKS Eh?

srsly, that always happens..
-
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.518 seconds.